Papers › A Thorough Investigation of Content-Defined Chunking Algorithms for Data Deduplication
A Thorough Investigation of Content-Defined Chunking Algorithms for Data Deduplication
Marcel Gregoriadis, Leonhard Balduf, Björn Scheuermann, Johan Pouwelse
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Data deduplication emerged as a powerful solution for reducing storage and bandwidth costs in cloud settings by eliminating redundancies at the level of chunks. This has spurred the development of numerous Content-Defined Chunking (CDC) algorithms over the past two decades. Despite advancements, the current state-of-the-art remains obscure, as a thorough and impartial analysis and comparison is lacking. We conduct a rigorous theoretical analysis and impartial experimental comparison of several leading CDC algorithms. Using four realistic datasets, we evaluate these algorithms against four key metrics: throughput, deduplication ratio, average chunk size, and chunk-size variance. Our analyses, in many instances, extend the findings of their original publications by reporting new results and putting existing ones into context. Moreover, we highlight limitations that have previously gone unnoticed. Our findings provide valuable insights that inform the selection and optimization of CDC algorithms for practical applications in data deduplication.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections