Papers › A systematic aging method I: HII regions D118 and D119 in NGC 300
A systematic aging method I: HII regions D118 and D119 in NGC 300
H. F. Stevance, J. J. Eldridge, A. McLeod, E. R. Stanway, A. A. Chrimes
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Accurately determining the age of H\,{ii} regions and the stars they host is as important as it is challenging. Historically the most popular method has been isochrone fitting to Hertzsprung-Russell Diagrams or Colour-Magnitude Diagrams. Here we introduce a different method for age determination using BPASS and hoki. We infer the most likely ages of the regions D118 and D119 NGC 300 to be log(age/years)=6.86^(0.05)_(0.06) and we also deduce stellar mass and number counts by comparison with the BPASS models. We compare how our binary and single star models perform and find that the latter are unable to predict 20 per cent (± 10 per cent) of our sample. We also discuss how results obtained from isochrone fitting would differ. We conclude that ages could be underestimated by ~0.2 dex and that the limitations of the isochrone method is not solely due to the lack of binary stars. We propose that the method presented here is more reliable and more widely applicable since it can be used on smaller samples. Alongside this study, we release new hoki features to allow easy implementation of this method.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections