Papers › A Source-Criticism Debiasing Method for GloVe Embeddings

A Source-Criticism Debiasing Method for GloVe Embeddings

25 Jun 2021arXiv:2106.13382archive 2025-07-28

Hope McGovern

It is well-documented that word embeddings trained on large public corpora consistently exhibit known human social biases. Although many methods for debiasing exist, almost all fixate on completely eliminating biased information from the embeddings and often diminish training set size in the process. In this paper, we present a simple yet effective method for debiasing GloVe word embeddings (Pennington et al., 2014) which works by incorporating explicit information about training set bias rather than removing biased data outright. Our method runs quickly and efficiently with the help of a fast bias gradient approximation method from Brunet et al. (2019). As our approach is akin to the notion of 'source criticism' in the humanities, we term our method Source-Critical GloVe (SC-GloVe). We show that SC-GloVe reduces the effect size on Word Embedding Association Test (WEAT) sets without sacrificing training data or TOP-1 performance.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mebrunet/understanding-bias officialmentioned in paperMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Word Embeddings

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

GloVe

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections