Papers › A Sobering Assessment of Small-Molecule Force Field Methods for Low Energy Conformer...

A Sobering Assessment of Small-Molecule Force Field Methods for Low Energy Conformer Predictions

11 May 2017arXiv:1705.04308links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Ilana Y. Kanal, John A. Keith, Geoffrey R. Hutchison

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We have carried out a large scale computational investigation to assess the utility of common small-molecule force fields for computational screening of low energy conformers of typical organic molecules. Using statistical analyses on the energies and relative rankings of up to 250 diverse conformers of 700 different molecular structures, we find that energies from widely-used classical force fields (MMFF94, UFF, and GAFF) show unconditionally poor energy and rank correlation with semiempirical (PM7) and Kohn-Sham density functional theory (DFT) energies calculated at PM7 and DFT optimized geometries. In contrast, semiempirical PM7 calculations show significantly better correlation with DFT calculations and generally better geometries. With these results, we make recommendations to more reliably carry out conformer screening.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

ghutchis/conformer-scoring officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections