Papers › A Replication Study on Predicting Metamorphic Relations at Unit Testing Level
A Replication Study on Predicting Metamorphic Relations at Unit Testing Level
Alejandra Duque-Torres, Dietmar Pfahl, Rudolf Ramler, Claus Klammer
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Metamorphic Testing (MT) addresses the test oracle problem by examining the relations between inputs and outputs of test executions. Such relations are known as Metamorphic Relations (MRs). In current practice, identifying and selecting suitable MRs is usually a challenging manual task, requiring a thorough grasp of the SUT and its application domain. Thus, Kanewala et al. proposed the Predicting Metamorphic Relations (PMR) approach to automatically suggest MRs from a list of six pre-defined MRs for testing newly developed methods. PMR is based on a classification model trained on features extracted from the control-flow graph (CFG) of 100 Java methods. In our replication study, we explore the generalizability of PMR. First, we rebuild the entire preprocessing and training pipeline and repeat the original study in a close replication to verify the reported results and establish the basis for further experiments. Second, we perform a conceptual replication to explore the reusability of the PMR model trained on CFGs from Java methods in the first step for functionally identical methods implemented in Python and C++. Finally, we retrain the model on the CFGs from the Python and C++ methods to investigate the dependence on programming language and implementation details. We were able to successfully replicate the original study achieving comparable results for the Java methods set. However, the prediction performance of the Java-based classifiers significantly decreases when applied to functionally equivalent Python and C++ methods despite using only CFG features to abstract from language details. Since the performance improved again when the classifiers were retrained on the CFGs of the methods written in Python and C++, we conclude that the PMR approach can be generalized, but only when classifiers are developed starting from code artefacts in the used programming language.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections