Papers › A Python Extension to Simulate Petri nets in Process Mining

A Python Extension to Simulate Petri nets in Process Mining

16 Feb 2021arXiv:2102.08774links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

M. Pourbafrani, Sandhya Vasudevan, Faizan Zafar, Yuan Xingran, Ravikumar Singh, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The capability of process mining techniques in providing extensive knowledge and insights into business processes has been widely acknowledged. Process mining techniques support discovering process models as well as analyzing process performance and bottlenecks in the past executions of processes. However, process mining tends to be "backward-looking" rather than "forward-looking" techniques like simulation. For example, process improvement also requires "what-if" analyses. In this paper, we present a Python library that uses an event log to directly generate a simulated event log, with additional options for end-users to specify the duration of activities and the arrival rate. Since the generated simulation model is supported by historical data (event data)and it is based on the Discrete Event Simulation (DES) technique, the generated event data is similar to the behavior of the real process.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mbafrani/AutomaticProcessSimulation officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections