Papers › A practical, effective calculation of gamma difference distributions with open data...

A practical, effective calculation of gamma difference distributions with open data science tools

10 May 2021arXiv:2105.04427links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Martina Hančová, Andrej Gajdoš, Jozef Hanč

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

At present, there is still no officially accepted and extensively verified implementation of computing the gamma difference distribution allowing unequal shape parameters. We explore four computational ways of the gamma difference distribution with the different shape parameters resulting from time series kriging, a forecasting approach based on the best linear unbiased prediction, and linear mixed models. The results of our numerical study, with emphasis on using open data science tools, demonstrate that our open tool implemented in high-performance Python(with Numba) is exponentially fast, highly accurate, and very reliable. It combines numerical inversion of the characteristic function and the trapezoidal rule with the double exponential oscillatory transformation (DE quadrature). At the double 53-bit precision, our tool outperformed the speed of the analytical computation based on Tricomi's U(a, b, z) function in CAS software (commercial Mathematica, open SageMath) by 1.5-2 orders. At the precision of scientific numerical computational tools, it exceeded open SciPy, NumPy, and commercial MATLAB 5-10 times. The potential future application of our tool for a mixture of characteristic functions could open new possibilities for fast data analysis based on exact probability distributions in areas like multidimensional statistics, measurement uncertainty analysis in metrology as well as in financial mathematics and risk analysis.

PaperPDFCode

Code

fdslrm/GDD officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections