Papers › A note on joint calibration estimators for totals and quantiles

A note on joint calibration estimators for totals and quantiles

25 Aug 2023arXiv:2308.13281links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Maciej Beręsewicz, Marcin Szymkowiak

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

In this paper, we combine calibration for population totals proposed by Deville and S\"arndal (1992) with calibration for population quantiles introduced by Harms and Duchesne (2006). We also extend the pseudo-empirical likelihood method proposed by Chen, Sitter, and Wu (2002). This approach extends the calibration equations for totals by adding relevant constraints on quantiles of continuous variables observed in the data. The proposed approach can be easily applied to handle non-response and data integration problems, and results in a single vector of weights. Furthermore, it is a multipurpose solution, i.e. it makes it possible to improve estimates of means, totals and quantiles for a variable of interest in one step. In a limited simulation study, we compare the proposed joint approach with standard calibration, calibration using empirical likelihood and the correctly specified inverse probability weighting estimator. Open source software implementing the proposed method is available.

PaperPDFCode

Code

ncn-foreigners/jointcalib officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections