Papers › A new timestep criterion for N-body simulations
A new timestep criterion for N-body simulations
Dang Pham, Hanno Rein, David S. Spiegel
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We derive a new criterion for estimating characteristic dynamical timescales in N-body simulations. The criterion uses the second, third, and fourth derivatives of particle positions: acceleration, jerk, and snap. It can be used for choosing timesteps in integrators with adaptive step size control. For any two-body problem the criterion is guaranteed to determine the orbital period and pericenter timescale regardless of eccentricity. We discuss why our criterion is the simplest derivative-based expression for choosing adaptive timesteps with the above properties and show its superior performance over existing criteria in numerical tests. Because our criterion uses lower order derivatives, it is less susceptible to rounding errors caused by finite floating point precision. This significantly decreases the volume of phase space where an adaptive integrator fails or gets stuck due to unphysical timestep estimates. For example, our new criterion can accurately estimate timesteps for orbits around a 50m sized Solar System object located at 40AU from the coordinate origin when using double floating point precision. Previous methods where limited to objects larger than 10km. We implement our new criterion in the high order IAS15 integrator which is part of the freely available N-body package REBOUND.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections