Papers › A Mutation Framework for Evaluating Security Analysis tools in IoT Applications
A Mutation Framework for Evaluating Security Analysis tools in IoT Applications
Manar H. Alalfi, Sajeda Parveen, Bara Nazzal
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
With the growing and widespread use of Internet of Things (IoT) in our daily life, its security is becoming more crucial. To ensure information security, we require better security analysis tools for IoT applications. Hence, this paper presents an automated framework to evaluate taint-flow analysis tools in the domain of IoT applications. First, we propose a set of mutational operators tailored to evaluate three types of sensitivity analysis, flow, path and context sensitivity. Then we developed mutators to automatically generate mutants for those types. We demonstrated the framework on a subset of mutational operators to evaluate three taint-flow analyzers, SaINT, Taint-Things and FlowsMiner. Our framework and experiments ranked the taint analysis tools according to precision and recall as follows: Taint-Things (99% Recall, 100% Precision), FlowsMiner (100% Recall, 87.6% Precision), and SaINT (100% Recall, 56.8% Precision). To the best of our knowledge, our framework is the first framework to address the need for evaluating taint-flow analysis tools and specifically those developed for IoT SmartThings applications.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections