Papers › A Multi-fidelity Estimator of the Expected Information Gain for Bayesian Optimal...
A Multi-fidelity Estimator of the Expected Information Gain for Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design
Thomas E. Coons, Xun Huan
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Optimal experimental design (OED) is a framework that leverages a mathematical model of the experiment to identify optimal conditions for conducting the experiment. Under a Bayesian approach, the design objective function is typically chosen to be the expected information gain (EIG). However, EIG is intractable for nonlinear models and must be estimated numerically. Estimating the EIG generally entails some variant of Monte Carlo sampling, requiring repeated data model and likelihood evaluations x2013 each involving solving the governing equations of the experimental physics x2013 under different sample realizations. This computation becomes impractical for high-fidelity models. We introduce a novel multi-fidelity EIG (MF-EIG) estimator under the approximate control variate (ACV) framework. This estimator is unbiased with respect to the high-fidelity mean, and minimizes variance under a given computational budget. We achieve this by first reparameterizing the EIG so that its expectations are independent of the data models, a requirement for compatibility with ACV. We then provide specific examples under different data model forms, as well as practical enhancements of sample size optimization and sample reuse techniques. We demonstrate the MF-EIG estimator in two numerical examples: a nonlinear benchmark and a turbulent flow problem involving the calibration of shear-stress transport turbulence closure model parameters within the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes model. We validate the estimator's unbiasedness and observe one- to two-orders-of-magnitude variance reduction compared to existing single-fidelity EIG estimators.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections