Papers › A Light CNN for Deep Face Representation with Noisy Labels

A Light CNN for Deep Face Representation with Noisy Labels

9 Nov 2015arXiv:1511.02683archive 2025-07-28

Xiang Wu, Ran He, Zhenan Sun, Tieniu Tan

The volume of convolutional neural network (CNN) models proposed for face recognition has been continuously growing larger to better fit large amount of training data. When training data are obtained from internet, the labels are likely to be ambiguous and inaccurate. This paper presents a Light CNN framework to learn a compact embedding on the large-scale face data with massive noisy labels. First, we introduce a variation of maxout activation, called Max-Feature-Map (MFM), into each convolutional layer of CNN. Different from maxout activation that uses many feature maps to linearly approximate an arbitrary convex activation function, MFM does so via a competitive relationship. MFM can not only separate noisy and informative signals but also play the role of feature selection between two feature maps. Second, three networks are carefully designed to obtain better performance meanwhile reducing the number of parameters and computational costs. Lastly, a semantic bootstrapping method is proposed to make the prediction of the networks more consistent with noisy labels. Experimental results show that the proposed framework can utilize large-scale noisy data to learn a Light model that is efficient in computational costs and storage spaces. The learned single network with a 256-D representation achieves state-of-the-art results on various face benchmarks without fine-tuning. The code is released on https://github.com/AlfredXiangWu/LightCNN.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1511.02683")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 2 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran; community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

19 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.

AlfredXiangWu/LightCNN officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
AlfredXiangWu/face_verification_experiment officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
Mind23-2/MindCode-56 mentioned on GitHubmindspore report
gcastex/PruNet mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
lyatdawn/lightcnn-mxnet mentioned on GitHubmxnet report
ozora-ogino/LCNN mentioned on GitHubtfMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
1ran · our draft was wrong

Licence: 1 of the 2 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

read_list AlfredXiangWu/LightCNN/extract_features.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · 4a6362e1eee5a452 · report
clip_gradient Mind23-2/MindCode-56/src/lightcnn.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 7b0d61a663a3d558 · report

Tasks

Face IdentificationFace RecognitionFace VerificationImage Editing Dectionfeature selection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Age-Invariant Face Recognition CACDVS MFM-CNN Accuracy 97.95% #8 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Age-Invariant Face Recognition CAFR Light CNN Accuracy 73.56% #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Face Identification MegaFace Light CNN-29 Accuracy 73.749% #11 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Face Verification MegaFace Light CNN-29 Accuracy 85.133% #12 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Face Verification YouTube Faces DB Light CNN-29 Accuracy 95.54% #7 of 12 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Maxout

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections