Papers › A Full-Stack Open-Source Framework for Antenna and Beamforming Evaluation in mmWave 5G NR
A Full-Stack Open-Source Framework for Antenna and Beamforming Evaluation in mmWave 5G NR
Mattia Lecci, Tommaso Zugno, Silvia Zampato, Michele Zorzi
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Millimeter wave (mmWave) communication represents one of the main innovations of the next generation of wireless technologies, allowing users to reach unprecedented data rates. To overcome the high path loss at mmWave frequencies, these systems make use of directional antennas able to focus the transmit power into narrow beams using BeamForming (BF) techniques, thus making the communication directional. This new paradigm opens up a set of challenges for the design of efficient wireless systems, in which antenna and BF components play an important role also at the higher layer of the protocol stack. For this reason, accurate modeling of these components in a full-stack simulation is of primary importance to understand the overall system behavior. This paper proposes a novel framework for the end-to-end simulation of 5G mmWave cellular networks, including a ray-tracing based channel model and accurate models for antenna arrays and BF schemes. We showcase this framework by evaluating the performance of different antenna and BF configurations considering both link-level and end-to-end metrics and present the obtained results.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections