Papers › A Fresh Look at the Architecture and Performance of Contemporary Isolation Platforms
A Fresh Look at the Architecture and Performance of Contemporary Isolation Platforms
Vincent van Rijn, Jan S. Rellermeyer
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
With the ever-increasing pervasiveness of the cloud computing paradigm, strong isolation guarantees and low performance overhead from isolation platforms are paramount. An ideal isolation platform offers both: an impermeable isolation boundary while imposing a negligible performance overhead. In this paper, we examine various isolation platforms (containers, secure containers, hypervisors, unikernels), and conduct a wide array of experiments to measure the performance overhead and degree of isolation offered by the platforms. We find that container platforms have the best, near-native, performance while the newly emerging secure containers suffer from various overheads. The highest degree of isolation is achieved by unikernels, closely followed by traditional containers.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections