Papers › A Faster Sampler for Discrete Determinantal Point Processes
A Faster Sampler for Discrete Determinantal Point Processes
Simon Barthelmé, Nicolas Tremblay, Pierre-Olivier Amblard
Discrete Determinantal Point Processes (DPPs) have a wide array of potential applications for subsampling datasets. They are however held back in some cases by the high cost of sampling. In the worst-case scenario, the sampling cost scales as O(n^3) where n is the number of elements of the ground set. A popular workaround to this prohibitive cost is to sample DPPs defined by low-rank kernels. In such cases, the cost of standard sampling algorithms scales as O(np^2 + nm^2) where m is the (average) number of samples of the DPP (usually m << n) and p the rank of the kernel used to define the DPP (m \leq p \leq n). The first term, O(np^2), comes from a SVD-like step. We focus here on the second term of this cost, O(nm^2), and show that it can be brought down to O(nm + m^3 log m) without loss on the sampling's exactness. In practice, we observe very substantial speedups compared to the classical algorithm as soon as n > 1000. The algorithm described here is a close variant of the standard algorithm for sampling continuous DPPs, and uses rejection sampling. In the specific case of projection DPPs, we also show that any additional sample can be drawn in time O(m^3 log m). Finally, an interesting by-product of the analysis is that a realisation from a DPP is typically contained in a subset of size O(m log m) formed using leverage score i.i.d. sampling.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections