Papers › A Fast and Effective Breakpoints Heuristic Algorithm for the Quadratic Knapsack Problem
A Fast and Effective Breakpoints Heuristic Algorithm for the Quadratic Knapsack Problem
Dorit S. Hochbaum, Philipp Baumann, Olivier Goldschmidt, Yiqing Zhang
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The Quadratic Knapsack Problem (QKP) involves selecting a subset of elements that maximizes the sum of pairwise and singleton utilities without exceeding a given budget. The pairwise utilities are nonnegative, the singleton utilities may be positive, negative, or zero, and the node costs are nonnegative. We introduce a Breakpoints Algorithm for QKP, named QKBP, which is based on a technique proposed in \cite{Hoc09} for efficiently generating the concave envelope of the solutions to the relaxation of the problem for all values of the budget. Our approach utilizes the fact that breakpoints in the concave envelopes are optimal solutions for their respective budgets. For budgets between breakpoints, a fast greedy heuristic derives high-quality solutions from the optimal solutions of adjacent breakpoints. The QKBP algorithm is a heuristic which is highly scalable due to an efficient parametric cut procedure used to generate the concave envelope. This efficiency is further improved by a newly developed compact problem formulation. Our extensive computational study on both existing and new benchmark instances, with up to 10,000 elements, shows that while some leading algorithms perform well on a few instances, QKBP consistently delivers high-quality solutions regardless of instance size, density, or budget. Moreover, QKBP achieves these results in significantly faster running times than all leading algorithms. The source code of the QKBP algorithm, the benchmark instances, and the detailed results are publicly available on GitHub.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections