Papers › A Derivation of the Pythagorean Won-Loss Formula in Baseball
A Derivation of the Pythagorean Won-Loss Formula in Baseball
Steven J. Miller
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
It has been noted that in many professional sports leagues a good predictor of a team's won-loss percentage is Bill James' Pythagorean Formula RSobs^c / (RSobs^c + RAobs^c), where RSobs (resp. RAobs) is the observed average number of runs scored (allowed) per game and c is a constant for the league; for baseball the best agreement is when c is about 1.82. We provide a theoretical justification for this formula and value of c by modelling the number of runs scored and allowed in baseball games as independent random variables drawn from Weibull distributions with the same b and c but different a; the probability density f(x;a,b,c) is 0 for x < b and is (c/a) ((x-b)/a)^{c-1} exp(-((x-b)/a)^c) otherwise. This model leads to a predicted won-loss percentage of (RS-b)^c / ((RS-b)^c + (RA-b)^c); here RS (resp. RA) is the mean of the random variable corresponding to runs scored (allowed), and RS - b (resp. RA - b) is an estimator of RSobs (resp. RAobs). An analysis of the 14 American League teams from the 2004 baseball season shows that (1) given that the runs scored and allowed in a game cannot be equal, the runs scored and allowed are statistically independent; (2) the best fit Weibull parameters attained from a least squares or a maximum likelihood analysis give good fits; least squares gives a mean value of c of 1.79 with a standard deviation of .09, and maximum likelihood gives a mean value of c of 1.74 with a standard deviation of .06, which agree beautifully with the observed best value of 1.82 attained by fitting RSobs^c / (RSobs^c + RAobs^c) to the observed winning percentages.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections