Papers › Large Scale Image Segmentation with Structured Loss based Deep Learning for Connectome...
Large Scale Image Segmentation with Structured Loss based Deep Learning for Connectome Reconstruction
Jan Funke, Fabian David Tschopp, William Grisaitis, Arlo Sheridan, Chandan Singh, Stephan Saalfeld, Srinivas C. Turaga
We present a method combining affinity prediction with region agglomeration, which improves significantly upon the state of the art of neuron segmentation from electron microscopy (EM) in accuracy and scalability. Our method consists of a 3D U-NET, trained to predict affinities between voxels, followed by iterative region agglomeration. We train using a structured loss based on MALIS, encouraging topologically correct segmentations obtained from affinity thresholding. Our extension consists of two parts: First, we present a quasi-linear method to compute the loss gradient, improving over the original quadratic algorithm. Second, we compute the gradient in two separate passes to avoid spurious gradient contributions in early training stages. Our predictions are accurate enough that simple learning-free percentile-based agglomeration outperforms more involved methods used earlier on inferior predictions. We present results on three diverse EM datasets, achieving relative improvements over previous results of 27%, 15%, and 250%. Our findings suggest that a single method can be applied to both nearly isotropic block-face EM data and anisotropic serial sectioned EM data. The runtime of our method scales linearly with the size of the volume and achieves a throughput of about 2.6 seconds per megavoxel, qualifying our method for the processing of very large datasets.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain Image Segmentation | CREMI | U-NET MALA | CREMI Score | 0.289 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Brain Image Segmentation | CREMI | U-NET MALA | VOI | 0.606 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Brain Image Segmentation | FIB-25 Synaptic Sites | U-NET MALA | VOI | 2.151 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Brain Image Segmentation | FIB-25 Whole Test | U-NET MALA | VOI | 1.071 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Brain Image Segmentation | SegEM | U-NET MALA | IED | 4.839 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections