Papers › A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videos

A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videos

29 Apr 2022arXiv:2204.14047archive 2025-07-28

Wei Sun, Xiongkuo Min, Wei Lu, Guangtao Zhai

Quality assessment for User Generated Content (UGC) videos plays an important role in ensuring the viewing experience of end-users. Previous UGC video quality assessment (VQA) studies either use the image recognition model or the image quality assessment (IQA) models to extract frame-level features of UGC videos for quality regression, which are regarded as the sub-optimal solutions because of the domain shifts between these tasks and the UGC VQA task. In this paper, we propose a very simple but effective UGC VQA model, which tries to address this problem by training an end-to-end spatial feature extraction network to directly learn the quality-aware spatial feature representation from raw pixels of the video frames. We also extract the motion features to measure the temporal-related distortions that the spatial features cannot model. The proposed model utilizes very sparse frames to extract spatial features and dense frames (i.e. the video chunk) with a very low spatial resolution to extract motion features, which thereby has low computational complexity. With the better quality-aware features, we only use the simple multilayer perception layer (MLP) network to regress them into the chunk-level quality scores, and then the temporal average pooling strategy is adopted to obtain the video-level quality score. We further introduce a multi-scale quality fusion strategy to solve the problem of VQA across different spatial resolutions, where the multi-scale weights are obtained from the contrast sensitivity function of the human visual system. The experimental results show that the proposed model achieves the best performance on five popular UGC VQA databases, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed model. The code will be publicly available.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections