Papers › A Cross-Scene Benchmark for Open-World Drone Active Tracking

A Cross-Scene Benchmark for Open-World Drone Active Tracking

1 Dec 2024arXiv:2412.00744archive 2025-07-28

Haowei Sun, Jinwu Hu, Zhirui Zhang, Haoyuan Tian, Xinze Xie, Yufeng Wang, Zhuliang Yu, Xiaohua Xie, Mingkui Tan

Drone Visual Active Tracking aims to autonomously follow a target object by controlling the motion system based on visual observations, providing a more practical solution for effective tracking in dynamic environments. However, accurate Drone Visual Active Tracking using reinforcement learning remains challenging due to the absence of a unified benchmark, the complexity of open-world environments with frequent interference, and the diverse motion behavior of dynamic targets. To address these issues, we propose a unified cross-scene cross-domain benchmark for open-world drone active tracking called DAT. The DAT benchmark provides 24 visually complex environments to assess the algorithms' cross-scene and cross-domain generalization abilities, and high-fidelity modeling of realistic robot dynamics. Additionally, we propose a reinforcement learning-based drone tracking method called R-VAT, which aims to improve the performance of drone tracking targets in complex scenarios. Specifically, inspired by curriculum learning, we introduce a Curriculum-Based Training strategy that progressively enhances the agent tracking performance in vast environments with complex interference. We design a goal-centered reward function to provide precise feedback to the drone agent, preventing targets farther from the center of view from receiving higher rewards than closer ones. This allows the drone to adapt to the diverse motion behavior of open-world targets. Experiments demonstrate that the R-VAT has about 400% improvement over the SOTA method in terms of the cumulative reward metric.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

7 samples harvested; 1 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 6 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 7 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from SHWplus/DAT_Benchmark. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections