Papers › A Critical Assessment of State-of-the-Art in Entity Alignment
A Critical Assessment of State-of-the-Art in Entity Alignment
Max Berrendorf, Ludwig Wacker, Evgeniy Faerman
In this work, we perform an extensive investigation of two state-of-the-art (SotA) methods for the task of Entity Alignment in Knowledge Graphs. Therefore, we first carefully examine the benchmarking process and identify several shortcomings, which make the results reported in the original works not always comparable. Furthermore, we suspect that it is a common practice in the community to make the hyperparameter optimization directly on a test set, reducing the informative value of reported performance. Thus, we select a representative sample of benchmarking datasets and describe their properties. We also examine different initializations for entity representations since they are a decisive factor for model performance. Furthermore, we use a shared train/validation/test split for a fair evaluation setting in which we evaluate all methods on all datasets. In our evaluation, we make several interesting findings. While we observe that most of the time SotA approaches perform better than baselines, they have difficulties when the dataset contains noise, which is the case in most real-life applications. Moreover, we find out in our ablation study that often different features of SotA methods are crucial for good performance than previously assumed. The code is available at https://github.com/mberr/ea-sota-comparison.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity Alignment | DBP15k zh-en | RDGCN | Hits@1 | 0.6954 | #22 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Entity Alignment | DBP15k zh-en | Zero Shot | Hits@1 | 0.594 | #27 of 38 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Entity Alignment | dbp15k fr-en | Zero Shot | Hits@1 | 0.8370 | #11 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Entity Alignment | dbp15k ja-en | Zero Shot | Hits@1 | 0.6564 | #14 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections