Papers › A Closer Look at Small-Scale Magnetic Flux Ropes in the Solar Wind at 1 AU: Results...

A Closer Look at Small-Scale Magnetic Flux Ropes in the Solar Wind at 1 AU: Results from Improved Automated Detection

12 Nov 2023arXiv:2311.06759links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Hameedullah Farooki, Sung Jun Noh, Jeongwoo Lee, Haimin Wang, Hyomin Kim, Yasser Abduallah, Jason T. L. Wang, Yu Chen, Sergio Servidio, Francesco Pecora

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Small-scale interplanetary magnetic flux ropes (SMFRs) are similar to ICMEs in magnetic structure, but are smaller and do not exhibit ICME plasma signatures. We present a computationally efficient and GPU-powered version of the single-spacecraft automated SMFR detection algorithm based on the Grad-Shafranov (GS) technique. Our algorithm is capable of processing higher resolution data, eliminates selection bias caused by a fixed B threshold, has improved detection criteria demonstrated to have better results on an MHD simulation, and recovers full 2.5D cross sections using GS reconstruction. We used it to detect 512,152 SMFRs from 27 years (1996 to 2022) of 3-second cadence \emph{Wind} measurements. Our novel findings are: (1) the radial density of SMFRs at 1 au (∼1 per 10⁶) and filling factor (${\sim}35%) are independent of solar activity, distance to the heliospheric current sheet (HCS), and solar wind plasma type, although the minority of SMFRs with diameters greater than{\sim}0.01 au have a strong solar activity dependence; (2) SMFR diameters follow a log-normal distribution that peaks below the resolved range (\gtrsim 10^4$ km), although the filling factor is dominated by SMFRs between 10⁵ to 10⁶ km; (3) most SMFRs at 1 au have strong field-aligned flows like those from PSP measurements; (4) in terms of diameter d, SMFR poloidal flux ∝d^(1.2), axial flux ∝d^(2.0), average twist number ∝d^(-0.8), current density ∝d^(-0.8), and helicity ∝d^(3.2). Implications for the origin of SMFRs and switchbacks are briefly discussed. The new algorithm and SMFR dataset are made freely available.

PaperPDFCode

Code

hafarooki/pymfr officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections