Papers › A Bootstrap-based Method for Testing Network Similarity

A Bootstrap-based Method for Testing Network Similarity

15 Nov 2019arXiv:1911.06869archive 2025-07-28

Somnath Bhadra, Kaustav Chakraborty, Srijan Sengupta, Soumendra Lahiri

This paper studies the matched network inference problem, where the goal is to determine if two networks, defined on a common set of nodes, exhibit a specific form of stochastic similarity. Two notions of similarity are considered: (i) equality, i.e., testing whether the networks arise from the same random graph model, and (ii) scaling, i.e., testing whether their probability matrices are proportional for some unknown scaling constant. We develop a testing framework based on a parametric bootstrap approach and a Frobenius norm-based test statistic. The proposed approach is highly versatile as it covers both the equality and scaling problems, and ensures adaptability under various model settings, including stochastic blockmodels, Chung-Lu models, and random dot product graph models. We establish theoretical consistency of the proposed tests and demonstrate their empirical performance through extensive simulations under a wide range of model classes. Our results establish the flexibility and computational efficiency of the proposed method compared to existing approaches. We also report a real-world application involving the Aarhus network dataset, which reveals meaningful sociological patterns across different communication layers.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Computational Efficiency

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Test

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections