Papers › A Benchmark for Evaluating Machine Translation Metrics on Dialects Without Standard Orthography

A Benchmark for Evaluating Machine Translation Metrics on Dialects Without Standard Orthography

28 Nov 2023arXiv:2311.16865archive 2025-07-28

Noëmi Aepli, Chantal Amrhein, Florian Schottmann, Rico Sennrich

For sensible progress in natural language processing, it is important that we are aware of the limitations of the evaluation metrics we use. In this work, we evaluate how robust metrics are to non-standardized dialects, i.e. spelling differences in language varieties that do not have a standard orthography. To investigate this, we collect a dataset of human translations and human judgments for automatic machine translations from English to two Swiss German dialects. We further create a challenge set for dialect variation and benchmark existing metrics' performances. Our results show that existing metrics cannot reliably evaluate Swiss German text generation outputs, especially on segment level. We propose initial design adaptations that increase robustness in the face of non-standardized dialects, although there remains much room for further improvement. The dataset, code, and models are available here: https://github.com/textshuttle/dialect_eval

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

microsofttranslator/ntrex officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Machine TranslationText Generation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

AWARESET

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections