Papers › 802.11 Wireless Simulation and Anomaly Detection using HMM and UBM

802.11 Wireless Simulation and Anomaly Detection using HMM and UBM

10 Jul 2017arXiv:1707.02933links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Anisa Allahdadi, Ricardo Morla, Jaime S. Cardoso

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Despite the growing popularity of 802.11 wireless networks, users often suffer from connectivity problems and performance issues due to unstable radio conditions and dynamic user behavior among other reasons. Anomaly detection and distinction are in the thick of major challenges that network managers encounter. Complication of monitoring the broaden and complex WLANs, that often requires heavy instrumentation of the user devices, makes the anomaly detection analysis even harder. In this paper we exploit 802.11 access point usage data and propose an anomaly detection technique based on Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and Universal Background Model (UBM) on data that is inexpensive to obtain. We then generate a number of network anomalous scenarios in OMNeT++/INET network simulator and compare the detection outcomes with those in baseline approaches (RawData and PCA). The experimental results show the superiority of HMM and HMM-UBM models in detection precision and sensitivity.

PaperPDFCode

Code

dpernes/spamhmm mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

wifi_data

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections