Papers › 3D-LLM: Injecting the 3D World into Large Language Models

3D-LLM: Injecting the 3D World into Large Language Models

24 Jul 2023NeurIPS 2023 11arXiv:2307.12981archive 2025-07-28

Yining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng, Yilun Du, Zhenfang Chen, Chuang Gan

Large language models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been proven to excel at multiple tasks, such as commonsense reasoning. Powerful as these models can be, they are not grounded in the 3D physical world, which involves richer concepts such as spatial relationships, affordances, physics, layout, and so on. In this work, we propose to inject the 3D world into large language models and introduce a whole new family of 3D-LLMs. Specifically, 3D-LLMs can take 3D point clouds and their features as input and perform a diverse set of 3D-related tasks, including captioning, dense captioning, 3D question answering, task decomposition, 3D grounding, 3D-assisted dialog, navigation, and so on. Using three types of prompting mechanisms that we design, we are able to collect over 300k 3D-language data covering these tasks. To efficiently train 3D-LLMs, we first utilize a 3D feature extractor that obtains 3D features from rendered multi- view images. Then, we use 2D VLMs as our backbones to train our 3D-LLMs. By introducing a 3D localization mechanism, 3D-LLMs can better capture 3D spatial information. Experiments on ScanQA show that our model outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by a large margin (e.g., the BLEU-1 score surpasses state-of-the-art score by 9%). Furthermore, experiments on our held-in datasets for 3D captioning, task composition, and 3D-assisted dialogue show that our model outperforms 2D VLMs. Qualitative examples also show that our model could perform more tasks beyond the scope of existing LLMs and VLMs. Project Page: : https://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/3dllm/.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2307.12981")

Code

Syntology Ran 6 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · violated contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 9 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

Pointcept/GPT4Point mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
Yui010206/CREMA mentioned on GitHubpytorchBSD-3-Clause report
openrobotlab/pointllm mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
qizekun/ShapeLLM mentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
umass-foundation-model/3d-llm mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · violated contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
4ran
4unverified

Licence: 10 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from umass-foundation-model/3d-llm. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

compress umass-foundation-model/3d-llm/3DLanguage_data/ChatCaptioner_based/quetion_model.py community (archive-listed) ran MIT recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · 80dde39da1ba3708 · report
interpolate_pos_embed umass-foundation-model/3d-llm/3DLLM_BLIP2-base/lavis/models/vit.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · c6ec173f19f5c34d · report
processDigitArticle umass-foundation-model/3d-llm/3DLLM_BLIP2-base/calculate_scores/calculate_score_3dmvvqa.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted MIT recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · 4e436e13094b20cb · report
processPunctuation umass-foundation-model/3d-llm/3DLLM_BLIP2-base/calculate_scores/calculate_score_3dmvvqa.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted MIT recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · 35e84a8da1d4f427 · report
tile umass-foundation-model/3d-llm/3DLLM_BLIP2-base/lavis/models/base_model.py community (archive-listed) ran fingerprinted MIT recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · cb33571427334815 · report
all_gather_with_grad umass-foundation-model/3d-llm/3DLLM_BLIP2-base/lavis/models/base_model.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · 0ec9fc2025c16f65 · report
decompress umass-foundation-model/3d-llm/3DLanguage_data/ChatCaptioner_based/quetion_model.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · a2b79de775636d17 · report
get_gpu_memory umass-foundation-model/3d-llm/3DLanguage_data/ChatCaptioner_based/quetion_model.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · fe66d0280e436155 · report
get_lemma umass-foundation-model/3d-llm/3DLLM_BLIP2-base/calculate_scores/calculate_score_3dmvvqa.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT recorded; this copy not marked cleared · pointer only · a1ff41c753bffe5d · report
disabled_train identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · violated contract licence of this copy not recorded · 4cb732f513d69dfd · report

Tasks

3D Object Captioning3D Question Answering (3D-QA)Dense CaptioningGenerative 3D Object ClassificationQuestion Answering

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
3D Object Captioning Objaverse 3D-LLM Sentence-BERT 44.48 #6 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
3D Object Captioning Objaverse 3D-LLM Correctness 1.77 #6 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
3D Object Captioning Objaverse 3D-LLM GPT-4 33.42 #6 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
3D Object Captioning Objaverse 3D-LLM Hallucination 1.16 #6 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
3D Object Captioning Objaverse 3D-LLM Precision 60.39 #6 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
3D Object Captioning Objaverse 3D-LLM SimCSE 43.68 #6 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (flamingo) BLEU-1 32.6 #8 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (flamingo) BLEU-4 8.4 #8 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (flamingo) CIDEr 65.6 #8 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (flamingo) Exact Match 23.2 #8 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (flamingo) METEOR 13.5 #8 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (flamingo) ROUGE 34.8 #8 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-flant5) BLEU-1 38.3 #14 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-flant5) BLEU-4 11.6 #14 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-flant5) CIDEr 69.6 #14 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-flant5) Exact Match 19.1 #14 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-flant5) METEOR 14.9 #14 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-flant5) ROUGE 35.3 #14 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-opt) BLEU-1 37.3 #15 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-opt) BLEU-4 10.7 #15 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-opt) CIDEr 67.1 #15 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-opt) Exact Match 19.1 #15 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-opt) METEOR 14.3 #15 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
3D Question Answering (3D-QA) ScanQA Test w/ objects 3D-LLM (BLIP2-opt) ROUGE 34.5 #15 of 18 Archive leaderboard report
Generative 3D Object Classification Objaverse 3D-LLM Objaverse (Average) 45.25 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Generative 3D Object Classification Objaverse 3D-LLM Objaverse (C) 41.50 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Generative 3D Object Classification Objaverse 3D-LLM Objaverse (I) 49.00 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections