Methods › Computer Vision › Image Data Augmentation › Random Scaling › Papers where code ran, page 1
Random Scaling
Papers archive 2025-07-28
archive papers tagged: 13 · with a code link: 8 · where Syntology ran a sample: 6 (6 with a run with no instrument failure, 0 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument) Syntology
Show: all tagged papersonly where code ran (6 of 13 tagged: 6 with a run with no instrument failure, 0 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument)
Syntology We ran code from the paper's repository; we did not isolate this method inside it.
Page 1 of 1: papers 1 to 6 of the 6 tagged papers where Syntology ran at least one harvested sample (6 with a run with no instrument failure, 0 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument), newest first by the archive's date (ties by arXiv id). This is a filter on Syntology's record ordered by date only, not a ranking; a run is not a correctness claim. A paper missing from this list is not a recorded non-run: it may have no arXiv id, no harvested code, or only samples that have not run yet.
Repository counts are the archive's code-links table. A Syntology line states what Syntology ran from that paper's harvested code, as “N ran (of which C constructed an object rather than computing a result; K with no instrument failure: H honoured, V violated, P with no contract checked; I where Syntology's instrument failed) · U unverified”; the instrument figure counts failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code. It is per sample and not a correctness claim. When the archive marks a repository official for the paper, the line starts with that repository's state (the archive's flag, not a verdict on who wrote the code; “community repositories only” when every sample that ran came from a community repository, “official: no sample here; runs from other or unrecorded repositories” when some came from a repository the paper names or has in its text, or from none recorded); hover it for the repositories the samples that ran came from.
-
PointRend: Image Segmentation as Rendering 17 Dec 2019 · 14 repositories · arXiv:1912.08193Syntology community repositories only · 16 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 13 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 13 with no contract checked; 3 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 2 unverified (of 18 harvested samples)
-
Bottom-up Object Detection by Grouping Extreme and Center Points 23 Jan 2019 · 2 repositories · arXiv:1901.08043Syntology official (archive's flag): 1 ran · 1 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 1 with no instrument failure: 1 honoured, 0 violated, 0 with no contract checked; 0 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 4 unverified (of 5 harvested samples)
-
Panoptic Feature Pyramid Networks 8 Jan 2019 · 12 repositories · arXiv:1901.02446Syntology community repositories only · 11 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 4 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 4 with no contract checked; 7 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 1 unverified (of 12 harvested samples) · 2 pointer-only (licence)
-
ESPNet: Efficient Spatial Pyramid of Dilated Convolutions for Semantic Segmentation 19 Mar 2018 · 8 repositories · arXiv:1803.06815Syntology official: harvested, nothing ran · 9 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 7 with no instrument failure: 2 honoured, 0 violated, 5 with no contract checked; 2 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 1 unverified (of 10 harvested samples)
-
Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation 17 Jun 2017 · 77 repositories · arXiv:1706.05587Syntology 3 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 2 with no instrument failure: 1 honoured, 0 violated, 1 with no contract checked; 1 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 4 unverified (of 7 harvested samples) · 3 pointer-only (licence)
-
DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs 2 Jun 2016 · 47 repositories · arXiv:1606.00915Syntology 43 ran (of which 12 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 39 with no instrument failure: 1 honoured, 0 violated, 38 with no contract checked; 4 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 20 unverified (of 63 harvested samples) · 18 pointer-only (licence)