Methods › Computer Vision › Image Data Augmentation › Fast AutoAugment › Papers where code ran, page 1
Fast AutoAugment
Papers archive 2025-07-28
archive papers tagged: 7 · with a code link: 6 · where Syntology ran a sample: 3 (2 with a run with no instrument failure, 1 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument) Syntology
Show: all tagged papersonly where code ran (3 of 7 tagged: 2 with a run with no instrument failure, 1 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument)
Syntology We ran code from the paper's repository; we did not isolate this method inside it.
Page 1 of 1: papers 1 to 3 of the 3 tagged papers where Syntology ran at least one harvested sample (2 with a run with no instrument failure, 1 where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument), newest first by the archive's date (ties by arXiv id). This is a filter on Syntology's record ordered by date only, not a ranking; a run is not a correctness claim. A paper missing from this list is not a recorded non-run: it may have no arXiv id, no harvested code, or only samples that have not run yet.
Repository counts are the archive's code-links table. A Syntology line states what Syntology ran from that paper's harvested code, as “N ran (of which C constructed an object rather than computing a result; K with no instrument failure: H honoured, V violated, P with no contract checked; I where Syntology's instrument failed) · U unverified”; the instrument figure counts failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code. It is per sample and not a correctness claim. When the archive marks a repository official for the paper, the line starts with that repository's state (the archive's flag, not a verdict on who wrote the code; “community repositories only” when every sample that ran came from a community repository, “official: no sample here; runs from other or unrecorded repositories” when some came from a repository the paper names or has in its text, or from none recorded); hover it for the repositories the samples that ran came from.
-
AutoCLINT: The Winning Method in AutoCV Challenge 2019 9 May 2020 · 1 repository · arXiv:2005.04373Syntology official (archive's flag): 3 ran · 3 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 0 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 0 with no contract checked; 3 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 0 unverified (of 3 harvested samples)
-
DADA: Differentiable Automatic Data Augmentation 8 Mar 2020 · 1 repository · arXiv:2003.03780Syntology official (archive's flag): 8 ran · 8 ran (of which 0 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 5 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 5 with no contract checked; 3 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 1 unverified (of 9 harvested samples) · 5 pointer-only (licence)
-
Fast AutoAugment 1 May 2019 · 11 repositories · arXiv:1905.00397Syntology official (archive's flag): 9 ran · 37 ran (of which 2 constructed an object rather than computing a result; 21 with no instrument failure: 0 honoured, 0 violated, 21 with no contract checked; 16 where Syntology's instrument failed) · 3 unverified (of 40 harvested samples) · 7 pointer-only (licence)