Datasets › Tennessee Eastman Process
Tennessee Eastman Process
This dataset contains simulations of a complex, large-scale chemical plant proposed by Downs and Vogel (1993). As described by Reinartz, Kulahci and Ravn (2021):
The process involves the production of two liquid product components G and H from four gaseous reactants A, C, D and E with an additional inert B and a byproduct F. The reaction system consists of four exothermic and irreversible reactions which are described by,
A(g) + C(g) + D(g) →G(liq) (Product 1) A(g) + C(g) + E(g) →H(liq) (Product 2) A(g) + E(g) →F(liq) (Byproduct) 3D(g) →F(liq) (Byproduct)
The analysis and simulations were done by Reinartz, Kulahci and Ravn (2021), who published the complete dataset online. In this context. Different simulations correspond to different types of faults, and operation conditions, Montesuma et al (2023) used these simulations to compose a Cross-Domain Fault Diagnosis problem.
References
Downs, J.J., Vogel, E.F., 1993. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 17 (3), 245–255. doi:10.1016/0098-1354(93)80018-I.
Christopher Reinartz, Murat Kulahci, and Ole Ravn. An extended tennessee eastman simulation dataset for faultdetection and decision support systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 149:107281, 2021
Montesuma, E. F., Mulas, M., Mboula, F. N., Corona, F., & Souloumiac, A. (2023). Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Cross-Domain Fault Diagnosis of Chemical Processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11247.
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard in the archive resolves to this dataset.
Papers archive 2025-07-28
No paper in the archive has a leaderboard row on this dataset; the archive counts 7 papers for it but never published that list.
Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28
No loader listed in the archive.
Tasks archive 2025-07-28
License archive 2025-07-28
Modalities archive 2025-07-28
Languages archive 2025-07-28
No language tagged.
Variants archive 2025-07-28
- Tennessee Eastman Process
1 variant name, as the archive lists them.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections