Datasets › Sentence-level argument annotation
Sentence-level argument annotation
The dataset is based on a debate.org crawl. It is restricted to a subset of four out of the total 23 categories -- politics, society, economics and science -- and contains additional annotations. 3 human annotators familiar with linguistics segmented these documents and labeled them as being of medium or low quality, to exclude low quality documents. The annotators were then asked to indicate the beginning of each new argument and to label argumentative sentences summarizing the aspects of the post as conclusion and outside of argumentation. In this way, we obtained a ground truth of labeled arguments on a sentence level (Krippendorff's alpha=0.24 based on 20 documents and three annotators).
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard in the archive resolves to this dataset.
Papers archive 2025-07-28
No paper in the archive has a leaderboard row on this dataset; the archive counts 1 paper for it but never published that list.
Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28
No loader listed in the archive.
Tasks archive 2025-07-28
No task tagged in the archive.
License archive 2025-07-28
MIT
Modalities archive 2025-07-28
No modality tagged.
Languages archive 2025-07-28
Variants archive 2025-07-28
- Sentence-level argument annotation
1 variant name, as the archive lists them.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections