Datasets › RewardBench

RewardBench

Introduced by Nathan Lambert et al. in RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling20 Mar 2024 archive 2025-07-28

RewardBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities and safety of reward models, including those trained with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). It serves as the first evaluation tool for reward models and provides valuable insights into their performance and reliability¹.

Here are the key components of RewardBench:

  1. Common Inference Code: The repository includes common inference code for various reward models, such as Starling, PairRM, OpenAssistant, and more. These models can be evaluated using the provided tools¹.

  2. Dataset and Evaluation: The RewardBench dataset consists of prompt-win-lose trios spanning chat, reasoning, and safety scenarios. It allows benchmarking reward models on challenging, structured, and out-of-distribution queries. The goal is to enhance scientific understanding of reward models and their behavior².

  3. Scripts for Evaluation:

    • scripts/run_rm.py: Used to evaluate individual reward models.
    • scripts/run_dpo.py: Used to evaluate direct preference optimization (DPO) models.
    • scripts/train_rm.py: A basic reward model training script built on TRL (Transformer Reinforcement Learning)¹.
  4. Installation and Usage:

    • Install PyTorch on your system.
    • Install the required dependencies using pip install -e ..
    • Set the environment variable HF_TOKEN with your token.
    • To contribute your model to the leaderboard, open an issue on HuggingFace with the model name. For local model evaluation, follow the instructions in the repository¹.

Remember that RewardBench provides a standardized way to assess reward models, ensuring transparency and comparability across different approaches. 🌟🔍

(1) GitHub - allenai/reward-bench: RewardBench: the first evaluation tool .... https://github.com/allenai/reward-bench. (2) RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13787. (3) RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling. https://paperswithcode.com/paper/rewardbench-evaluating-reward-models-for.

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard in the archive resolves to this dataset.

Papers archive 2025-07-28

No paper in the archive has a leaderboard row on this dataset; the archive counts 105 papers for it but never published that list.

Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28

No loader listed in the archive.

Tasks archive 2025-07-28

No task tagged in the archive.

License archive 2025-07-28

No licence recorded in the archive. Absence here is not a statement about the dataset's terms.

Modalities archive 2025-07-28

No modality tagged.

Languages archive 2025-07-28

No language tagged.

Variants archive 2025-07-28

  • RewardBench

1 variant name, as the archive lists them.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections