Datasets › misinfo-general

misinfo-general

Introduced by Ivo Verhoeven et al. in Yesterday's News: Benchmarking Multi-Dimensional Out-of-Distribution Generalisation of Misinformation Detection Models12 Oct 2024 archive 2025-07-28

We introduce misinfo-general, a benchmark dataset for evaluating misinformation models’ ability to perform out-of-distribution generalisation. Misinformation changes rapidly, much quicker than moderators can annotate at scale, resulting in a shift between the training and inference data distributions. As a result, misinformation models need to be able to perform out-of-distribution generalisation, an understudied problem in existing datasets.

Constructed on top of the various NELA corpora (2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022), misinfo-general is a large, diverse dataset consisting of news articles from reliable and unreliable publishers. Unlike NELA, we apply several rounds of deduplication and filtering to ensure all articles are of reasonable quality.

We use distant labelling to provide each publisher with rich metadata annotations. These annotations allow for simulating various generalisation splits that misinformation models are confronted with during deployment. We focus on 6 such splits-time, event, topic, publisher, political bias, misinformation type-but more are possible.

By releasing this dataset publicly, we hope to encourage future works that design misinformation models specifically with out-of-distribution generalisation in mind.

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard in the archive resolves to this dataset.

Papers archive 2025-07-28

No paper in the archive has a leaderboard row on this dataset; the archive counts 1 paper for it but never published that list.

Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28

No loader listed in the archive.

Tasks archive 2025-07-28

License archive 2025-07-28

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Modalities archive 2025-07-28

Languages archive 2025-07-28

Variants archive 2025-07-28

  • misinfo-general

1 variant name, as the archive lists them.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections