Datasets › MED

MED (Monotonicity Entailment Dataset)

Introduced by Hitomi Yanaka et al. in Can neural networks understand monotonicity reasoning? archive 2025-07-28

MED is a new evaluation dataset that covers a wide range of monotonicity reasoning that was created by crowdsourcing and collected from linguistics publications. The dataset was constructed by collecting naturally-occurring examples by crowdsourcing and well-designed ones from linguistics publications. It consists of 5,382 examples.

Source: https://github.com/verypluming/MED Image Source: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-4804v2.pdf

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

All 1 leaderboard whose dataset resolves to this page shown (sort by any header). "First row" is the archive's own first row at snapshot, in the archive's row order; nothing here re-ranks and metric direction is not asserted.

First row (archive order)PaperCode
Natural Language Inference MED NeuralLog 1:1 Accuracy 0.934 NeuralLog: Natural Language Inference with Joint Neural... eric11eca/NeuralLog 1 Compare

Papers archive 2025-07-28

1 shown of 1 paper with a leaderboard row on this dataset's benchmarks, newest first. The archive's own "papers using this dataset" list was never published, so this is the benchmark-backed subset; the archive's count for this dataset is 18. The Syntology column is from Syntology's graph (read 2026-09-24), stated per sample; it is not part of any archive number.

DateSamples run Syntology
NeuralLog: Natural Language Inference with Joint Neural and Logical Reasoning 1 1 29 May 2021 ran 0 of 6 samples (6 unverified)

Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28

1 loader as listed in the archive; links are outbound and not re-checked here.

Tasks archive 2025-07-28

License archive 2025-07-28

No licence recorded in the archive. Absence here is not a statement about the dataset's terms.

Modalities archive 2025-07-28

Languages archive 2025-07-28

Variants archive 2025-07-28

  • MED

1 variant name, as the archive lists them.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections