Datasets › Lot-insts
Lot-insts (Long-Tailed instituition names)
LoT-insts contains over 25k classes whose frequencies are naturally long-tail distributed. Its test set from four different subsets: many-, medium-, and few-shot sets, as well as a zero-shot open set. To our best knowledge, this is the first natural language dataset that focuses on this long-tailed and open classification problem.
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
All 2 leaderboards whose dataset resolves to this page shown (sort by any header). "First row" is the archive's own first row at snapshot, in the archive's row order; nothing here re-ranks and metric direction is not asserted.
| First row (archive order) | Paper | Code | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text Classification | Lot-insts | Character-BERT+RS Accuracy 83.73 | Text Classification in the Wild: a Large-scale... | lumia-group/lot-insts | 5 | Compare |
| Long-tail Learning | Lot-insts | Character-BERT+RS Macro-F1 65.90 | Text Classification in the Wild: a Large-scale... | lumia-group/lot-insts | 1 | Compare |
Papers archive 2025-07-28
1 shown of 1 paper with a leaderboard row on this dataset's benchmarks, newest first. The archive's own "papers using this dataset" list was never published, so this is the benchmark-backed subset; the archive's count for this dataset is 1. The Syntology column is from Syntology's graph (read 2026-09-24), stated per sample; it is not part of any archive number.
| Date | Samples run Syntology | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text Classification in the Wild: a Large-scale Long-tailed Name Normalization Dataset | 1 | 6 | 19 Feb 2023 | not harvested |
Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28
No loader listed in the archive.
Tasks archive 2025-07-28
License archive 2025-07-28
No licence recorded in the archive. Absence here is not a statement about the dataset's terms.
Modalities archive 2025-07-28
No modality tagged.
Languages archive 2025-07-28
Variants archive 2025-07-28
- Lot-insts
1 variant name, as the archive lists them.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections