Datasets › GAIA

GAIA (a benchmark for general AI assistants)

Introduced by Grégoire Mialon et al. in GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants21 Nov 2023 archive 2025-07-28

We introduce GAIA, a benchmark for General AI Assistants that, if solved, would represent a milestone in AI research. GAIA proposes real-world questions that require a set of fundamental abilities such as reasoning, multi-modality handling, web browsing, and generally tool-use proficiency. GAIA questions are conceptually simple for humans yet challenging for most advanced AIs: we show that human respondents obtain 92% vs. 15% for GPT-4 equipped with plugins. This notable performance disparity contrasts with the recent trend of LLMs outperforming humans on tasks requiring professional skills in e.g. law or chemistry. GAIA’s philosophy departs from the current trend in AI benchmarks suggesting to target tasks that are ever more difficult for humans. We posit that the advent of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) hinges on a system’s capability to exhibit similar robustness as the average human does on such questions. Using GAIA’s methodology, we devise 466 questions and their answer. We release our questions while retaining answers to 300 of them to power a leader-board accessible at https://huggingface.co/gaia-benchmark.

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard in the archive resolves to this dataset.

Papers archive 2025-07-28

No paper in the archive has a leaderboard row on this dataset; the archive counts 61 papers for it but never published that list.

Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28

No loader listed in the archive.

Tasks archive 2025-07-28

No task tagged in the archive.

License archive 2025-07-28

No licence recorded in the archive. Absence here is not a statement about the dataset's terms.

Modalities archive 2025-07-28

No modality tagged.

Languages archive 2025-07-28

No language tagged.

Variants archive 2025-07-28

  • GAIA

1 variant name, as the archive lists them.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections