Datasets › COCO-WAN (Medium noise)
COCO-WAN (Medium noise) (Benchmarking Label Noise in Instance Segmentation: Spatial Noise Matters)
The COCO-WAN benchmark is designed to assess the impact of weakly annotations (combined with auto-annotation tools) noise on instance segmentation models. This benchmark is built upon the COCO dataset and incorporates noise generated through weak annotations, simulating real-world scenarios where annotations might be imperfect due to semi-automated tools. It includes various levels of noise to challenge the robustness and generalization capabilities of segmentation models.
Accurately labeling instance segmentation datasets is a complex and error-prone task, often leading to noisy labels. The COCO-WAN benchmark aims to provide a realistic testing ground for models to handle such noisy annotations. By utilizing foundation models and weak annotations, COCO-WAN simulates semi-automated annotation tools, helping researchers understand how well their models can perform under less-than-ideal labeling conditions. This benchmark includes multiple noise levels (easy, medium, and hard) to reflect varying degrees of annotation imperfections.
Potential Use Cases of the Dataset:
Model Robustness Testing: Researchers can use COCO-WAN to evaluate how different instance segmentation models cope with noisy annotations, allowing for the development of more resilient algorithms. Annotation Tool Improvement: By analyzing model performance on COCO-WAN, developers of annotation tools can identify common pitfalls and work on reducing noise in their outputs.
Semi-Automated Annotation Systems: The benchmark provides insights into how models trained with semi-automated annotations perform, guiding improvements in such systems for better accuracy and efficiency in labeling tasks. The COCO-WAN benchmark offers a crucial resource for advancing the field of instance segmentation by highlighting the challenges posed by noisy labels and fostering the creation of more robust and reliable models.
Model Robustness Testing: Researchers can use COCO-WAN to evaluate how different instance segmentation models cope with spatial, real noisy annotations, allowing for the development of more resilient algorithms.
Semi-Automated Annotation Systems: The benchmark provides insights into how models trained with semi-automated annotations perform, guiding improvements in such systems for better accuracy and efficiency in labeling tasks.
The COCO-WAN benchmark offers a crucial resource for advancing the field of instance segmentation by highlighting the challenges posed by noisy labels and fostering the creation of more robust and reliable models.
Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28
All 1 leaderboard whose dataset resolves to this page shown (sort by any header). "First row" is the archive's own first row at snapshot, in the archive's row order; nothing here re-ranks and metric direction is not asserted.
| First row (archive order) | Paper | Code | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning with noisy labels | COCO-WAN | Mask R-CNN (ResNet-50-FPN) mIOU 25.5 | Benchmarking Label Noise in Instance Segmentation:... | eden500/Noisy-Labels-Instance-Segmentation | 1 | Compare |
Papers archive 2025-07-28
1 shown of 1 paper with a leaderboard row on this dataset's benchmarks, newest first. The archive's own "papers using this dataset" list was never published, so this is the benchmark-backed subset; the archive's count for this dataset is 1. The Syntology column is from Syntology's graph (read 2026-09-24), stated per sample; it is not part of any archive number.
| Date | Samples run Syntology | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmarking Label Noise in Instance Segmentation: Spatial Noise Matters | 1 | 1 | 16 Jun 2024 | ran 2 of 2 samples (0 unverified) |
Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28
No loader listed in the archive.
Tasks archive 2025-07-28
License archive 2025-07-28
Modalities archive 2025-07-28
Languages archive 2025-07-28
No language tagged.
Variants archive 2025-07-28
- COCO-WAN
- COCO-WAN (Medium noise)
2 variant names, as the archive lists them.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections