Datasets › BP^C

BP^C (A Benchmark Dataset for Causal Business Process Reasoning)

Introduced by Fabiana Fournier et al. in Towards a Benchmark for Causal Business Process Reasoning with LLMs15 Jul 2024 archive 2025-07-28

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for boosting organizational efficiency and automating tasks. While not originally designed for complex cognitive processes, recent efforts have further extended to employ LLMs in activities such as reasoning, planning, and decision-making. In business processes, such abilities could be invaluable for leveraging on the massive corpora LLMs have been trained on for gaining a deep understanding of such processes. In adherence to this goal, we attach here the BPC dataset, a newly developed set of process-aware Q&A that can be used to assess the ability of LLMs to reason about causal and process perspectives of business operations. We refer to this view as Causally-augmented Business Processes (BP^C). The benchmark comprises a set of domain-specific BPC related situations, a set of questions about these situations, and a set of ground truth answers to these questions. Reasoning on BP^C is of crucial importance for process interventions and process improvement. The benchmark could be used in one of two possible modalities: testing the performance of any target LLM and training an LLM to advance its capability to reason about BP^C.

Benchmarks archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard in the archive resolves to this dataset.

Papers archive 2025-07-28

No paper in the archive has a leaderboard row on this dataset; the archive counts 1 paper for it but never published that list.

Dataset loaders archive 2025-07-28

No loader listed in the archive.

Tasks archive 2025-07-28

No task tagged in the archive.

License archive 2025-07-28

Community Data License Agreement – Permissive, Version 2.0

Modalities archive 2025-07-28

No modality tagged.

Languages archive 2025-07-28

Variants archive 2025-07-28

  • BP^C

1 variant name, as the archive lists them.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections