{"url":"/task/extract-aspect-polarity-tuple","name":"Extract aspect-polarity tuple","slug":"extract-aspect-polarity-tuple","description_markdown":null,"categories":[{"name":"Natural Language Processing","url":"/area/natural-language-processing"}],"source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","slug_source":"derived"},"counts":{"papers_tagged":3,"papers_with_code":3,"benchmarks":1,"benchmark_tables_in_archive":1,"benchmark_tables_shown":1,"benchmark_tables_withheld_as_spam":0,"benchmark_definition":"a leaderboard table with at least one row; benchmark_tables_shown also counts the zero-row tables; benchmark_tables_in_archive adds the tables withheld as spam","datasets":0,"subtasks":0,"parent_tasks":1},"benchmarks":[{"leaderboard":"/sota/extract-aspect-polarity-tuple-on-semeval-2015","slug":"extract-aspect-polarity-tuple-on-semeval-2015","dataset":"SemEval 2015 Task 12","dataset_url":null,"rows_in_archive":1,"metrics":["F1 score"],"first_row_in_archive_order":{"model":"Syntactic Grammer Model","paper_title":"Review highlights: opinion mining on reviews: a hybrid model for rule selection in aspect extraction","paper_url":"/paper/review-highlights-opinion-mining-on-reviews-a","paper_date":"2017-10-18","arxiv_id":null,"code_links":[{"title":"yardstick17/AspectBasedSentimentAnalysis","url":"https://github.com/yardstick17/AspectBasedSentimentAnalysis"}],"syntology":null}}],"datasets":[],"subtasks":[],"parent_tasks":[{"url":"/task/aspect-based-sentiment-analysis","name":"Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA)"}],"papers":{"order":"repositories listed in the archive (desc), then date (desc); the archive holds no stars","population":"papers tagged with this task that list at least one repository in the archive","shown":3,"of":3,"tagged_in_all":3,"items":[{"url":"/paper/mvp-multi-view-prompting-improves-aspect","title":"MvP: Multi-view Prompting Improves Aspect Sentiment Tuple Prediction","date":"2023-05-22","arxiv_id":"2305.12627","repositories_listed":1,"syntology":null},{"url":"/paper/is-chatgpt-a-good-sentiment-analyzer-a","title":"Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer? A Preliminary Study","date":"2023-04-10","arxiv_id":"2304.04339","repositories_listed":1,"syntology":{"n":1,"n_ran":0,"n_unverified":1,"n_pointer_only":1}},{"url":"/paper/review-highlights-opinion-mining-on-reviews-a","title":"Review highlights: opinion mining on reviews: a hybrid model for rule selection in aspect extraction","date":"2017-10-18","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":1,"syntology":null}],"syntology_records":1,"syntology_note":"a paper without a record is not a recorded non-run: it may lack an arXiv id or simply be absent from the graph layer"},"description_links":{"kept":0,"unwrapped_to_text":0,"bare_urls_linked":0,"relative_images_dropped":0,"rule":"internal links are kept only when the target slug exists in the catalog"},"syntology":{"read_at":"2026-09-24T18:15:14+00:00","claim":"Per-sample execution status on synthesized fixtures ('ran N of M samples'); not a correctness claim and not a ranking signal.","status_vocabulary":{"ran_honours":"ran, honoured the contract we drafted","ran_violates":"ran, violated the contract we drafted","ran_draft_wrong":"ran; our contract draft was wrong, not the code","ran_fixture":"ran; our fixture could not drive it","ran":"ran on a synthesized input","unverified":"unverified (harvested, no recorded run)"}},"not_shown":{"libraries":"the archive has no per-task library table","trend_sparklines":"the Trend column of the benchmarks table was a rendered image; it is not in the archive","social_and_latest_sorts":"stars and social signals are not in the archive"}}