{"about":{"non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","site":"https://codewithpapers.app","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page","syntology":{"site":"https://syntology.ai","developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers","mcp":{"server":"https://syntology.ai/mcp","transport":"streamable-http","server_card":"https://syntology.ai/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","auth":{"type":"trial token, no account","trial_token":"https://syntology.ai/api/oauth/trial/token","method":"POST","docs":"https://syntology.ai/developers"}},"have":"https://syntology.ai/api/graph/have?x=<method, arXiv id or title> (free, answers coverage only)","paper_base":"https://syntology.ai/paper/","atlas_base":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus="},"machine_readable":[{"url":"https://codewithpapers.app/llms.txt","what":"the machine catalog: every machine-readable file, counted"},{"url":"https://codewithpapers.app/index/manifest.json","what":"paper-to-code index by arXiv id, with Syntology's counts"},{"url":"https://codewithpapers.app/search/manifest.json","what":"site search index (titles, authors) and its files"},{"url":"https://codewithpapers.app/download","what":"bulk files: Syntology's layer, described there"},{"url":"https://codewithpapers.app/build_manifest.json","what":"the build record: inputs, counts, exclusions, probes"}]},"url":"/task/argument-mining/papers/3","list_of":"/task/argument-mining","task":"Argument Mining","archive":{"snapshot":"2025-07-28"},"key_notes":{"n_ran_checked":"legacy name, kept unchanged so existing readers do not break: it counts the samples that ran with no instrument failure (honoured, violated, and ran with no contract checked); it does not mean a contract was checked, and the pages print it as 'K with no instrument failure', not 'K checked'","n_constructed":"a sub-count of the samples that ran, never subtracted from them and never a failure: an executed sample whose run returned an instance of its own class (fixture_out_type equals the entry name): the run built an object and did not compute a result (Syntology's RAN record, counts.constructed)"},"syntology_read_at":"2026-09-28T10:30:06+00:00","order":"archive","order_definition":"repositories listed in the archive (most first), then date (newest first), then slug","page":3,"pages_in_order":3,"rows_per_page":100,"rows":[201,284],"of":284,"counts":{"archive_papers_tagged":284,"with_a_code_link":98,"where_syntology_ran_a_sample":5,"not_listed_spam_title":0,"listed":284,"listed_where_code_ran":5,"where_syntology_ran_a_sample_split":{"with_a_run_with_no_instrument_failure":4,"every_run_a_failure_of_syntologys_instrument":1,"listed_with_a_run_with_no_instrument_failure":4,"listed_every_run_a_failure_of_syntologys_instrument":1,"filter":{"states":["a run with no instrument failure","any run, instrument failures included"],"default":"a run with no instrument failure","note":"on the 'only where code ran' pages the default hides, in the browser, the rows where every run was a failure of Syntology's instrument; the second state shows them again. Rows are hidden, never re-ordered; these twins list every row"}},"definition":"distinct papers the archive tags; 'where Syntology ran a sample' counts papers with at least one harvested sample that ran, which is not a correctness claim"},"first_page":"/task/argument-mining","prev":"/task/argument-mining/papers/2","next":null,"papers":[{"url":null,"slug":"challenge-or-empower-revisiting-argumentation","title":"Challenge or Empower: Revisiting Argumentation Quality in a News Editorial Corpus","date":"2018-10-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"cross-topic-argument-mining-from-1","title":"Cross-topic Argument Mining from Heterogeneous Sources","date":"2018-10-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"end-to-end-argument-mining-for-discussion","title":"End-to-End Argument Mining for Discussion Threads Based on Parallel Constrained Pointer Architecture","date":"2018-09-03","arxiv_id":"1809.00563","repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"argumentation-synthesis-following-rhetorical","title":"Argumentation Synthesis following Rhetorical Strategies","date":"2018-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"crst-a-claim-retrieval-system-in-twitter","title":"CRST: a Claim Retrieval System in Twitter","date":"2018-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"towards-an-argumentative-content-search","title":"Towards an argumentative content search engine using weak supervision","date":"2018-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"argumentext-searching-for-arguments-in","title":"ArgumenText: Searching for Arguments in Heterogeneous Sources","date":"2018-06-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"hhu-at-semeval-2018-task-12-analyzing-an","title":"HHU at SemEval-2018 Task 12: Analyzing an Ensemble-based Deep Learning Approach for the Argument Mining Task of Choosing the Correct Warrant","date":"2018-06-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"is-something-better-than-nothing","title":"Is Something Better than Nothing? Automatically Predicting Stance-based Arguments Using Deep Learning and Small Labelled Dataset","date":"2018-06-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"joker-at-semeval-2018-task-12-the-argument","title":"Joker at SemEval-2018 Task 12: The Argument Reasoning Comprehension with Neural Attention","date":"2018-06-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"argument-harvesting-using-chatbots","title":"Argument Harvesting Using Chatbots","date":"2018-05-11","arxiv_id":"1805.04253","repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":"/paper/a-corpus-of-erulemaking-user-comments-for","slug":"a-corpus-of-erulemaking-user-comments-for","title":"A Corpus of eRulemaking User Comments for Measuring Evaluability of Arguments","date":"2018-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"escrito-an-nlp-enhanced-educational-scoring","title":"ESCRITO - An NLP-Enhanced Educational Scoring Toolkit","date":"2018-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"increasing-argument-annotation","title":"Increasing Argument Annotation Reproducibility by Using Inter-annotator Agreement to Improve Guidelines","date":"2018-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"intertextual-correspondence-for-integrating","title":"Intertextual Correspondence for Integrating Corpora","date":"2018-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"multi-lingual-argumentative-corpora-in","title":"Multi-lingual Argumentative Corpora in English, Turkish, Greek, Albanian, Croatian, Serbian, Macedonian, Bulgarian, Romanian and Arabic","date":"2018-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"quantifying-qualitative-data-for","title":"Quantifying Qualitative Data for Understanding Controversial Issues","date":"2018-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"sentiment-stance-specificity-sss-dataset","title":"Sentiment-Stance-Specificity (SSS) Dataset: Identifying Support-based Entailment among Opinions.","date":"2018-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"cross-topic-argument-mining-from","title":"Cross-topic Argument Mining from Heterogeneous Sources Using Attention-based Neural Networks","date":"2018-02-15","arxiv_id":"1802.05758","repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"lightly-supervised-modeling-of-argument","title":"Lightly-Supervised Modeling of Argument Persuasiveness","date":"2017-11-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"200k-crowdsourced-political-arguments-for-a","title":"200K+ Crowdsourced Political Arguments for a New Chilean Constitution","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"analyzing-the-semantic-types-of-claims-and","title":"Analyzing the Semantic Types of Claims and Premises in an Online Persuasive Forum","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"annotation-of-argument-structure-in-japanese","title":"Annotation of argument structure in Japanese legal documents","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"argument-mining-on-twitter-arguments-facts","title":"Argument Mining on Twitter: Arguments, Facts and Sources","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"argument-relation-classification-using-a","title":"Argument Relation Classification Using a Joint Inference Model","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"building-an-argument-search-engine-for-the","title":"Building an Argument Search Engine for the Web","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"identifying-attack-and-support-argumentative","title":"Identifying attack and support argumentative relations using deep learning","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"improving-claim-stance-classification-with","title":"Improving Claim Stance Classification with Lexical Knowledge Expansion and Context Utilization","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"manual-identification-of-arguments-with","title":"Manual Identification of Arguments with Implicit Conclusions Using Semantic Rules for Argument Mining","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"mining-argumentative-structure-from-natural","title":"Mining Argumentative Structure from Natural Language text using Automatically Generated Premise-Conclusion Topic Models","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"patterns-of-argumentation-strategies-across","title":"Patterns of Argumentation Strategies across Topics","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"proceedings-of-the-4th-workshop-on-argument","title":"Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"projection-of-argumentative-corpora-from","title":"Projection of Argumentative Corpora from Source to Target Languages","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"toward-stance-classification-based-on-claim","title":"Toward Stance Classification Based on Claim Microstructures","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"unsupervised-corpusawide-claim-detection","title":"Unsupervised corpus--wide claim detection","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"unsupervised-detection-of-argumentative-units","title":"Unsupervised Detection of Argumentative Units though Topic Modeling Techniques","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"using-complex-argumentative-interactions-to","title":"Using Complex Argumentative Interactions to Reconstruct the Argumentative Structure of Large-Scale Debates","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"using-question-answering-techniques-to","title":"Using Question-Answering Techniques to Implement a Knowledge-Driven Argument Mining Approach","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"what-works-and-what-does-not-classifier-and","title":"What works and what does not: Classifier and feature analysis for argument mining","date":"2017-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"a-corpus-of-annotated-revisions-for-studying","title":"A Corpus of Annotated Revisions for Studying Argumentative Writing","date":"2017-07-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"argumentation-quality-assessment-theory-vs","title":"Argumentation Quality Assessment: Theory vs. Practice","date":"2017-07-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"pagerank-for-argument-relevance","title":"``PageRank'' for Argument Relevance","date":"2017-04-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"defeasible-acerules-a-prototype","title":"Defeasible AceRules: A Prototype","date":"2017-01-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"heres-my-point-joint-pointer-architecture-for","title":"Here's My Point: Joint Pointer Architecture for Argument Mining","date":"2016-12-28","arxiv_id":"1612.08994","repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"a-joint-sentiment-target-stance-model-for","title":"A Joint Sentiment-Target-Stance Model for Stance Classification in Tweets","date":"2016-12-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"a-news-editorial-corpus-for-mining","title":"A News Editorial Corpus for Mining Argumentation Strategies","date":"2016-12-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"using-argument-mining-to-assess-the","title":"Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays","date":"2016-12-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"challenges-of-argument-mining-generating-an","title":"Challenges of Argument Mining: Generating an Argument Synthesis based on the Qualia Structure","date":"2016-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"the-sensei-annotated-corpus-human-summaries","title":"The SENSEI Annotated Corpus: Human Summaries of Reader Comment Conversations in On-line News","date":"2016-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"a-preliminary-study-of-disputation-behavior","title":"A Preliminary Study of Disputation Behavior in Online Debating Forum","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"argumentation-content-structure-and","title":"Argumentation: Content, Structure, and Relationship with Essay Quality","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"argumentative-texts-and-clause-types","title":"Argumentative texts and clause types","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"claim-synthesis-via-predicate-recycling","title":"Claim Synthesis via Predicate Recycling","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"context-aware-argumentative-relation-mining","title":"Context-aware Argumentative Relation Mining","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"contextual-stance-classification-of-opinions","title":"Contextual stance classification of opinions: A step towards enthymeme reconstruction in online reviews","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"expert-stance-graphs-for-computational","title":"Expert Stance Graphs for Computational Argumentation","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"extracting-case-law-sentences-for","title":"Extracting Case Law Sentences for Argumentation about the Meaning of Statutory Terms","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"fill-the-gap-analyzing-implicit-premises","title":"Fill the Gap! Analyzing Implicit Premises between Claims from Online Debates","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"identifying-argument-components-through","title":"Identifying Argument Components through TextRank","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"neural-attention-model-for-classification-of","title":"Neural Attention Model for Classification of Sentences that Support Promoting/Suppressing Relationship","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"proceedings-of-the-third-workshop-on-argument","title":"Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016)","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"recognizing-the-absence-of-opposing-arguments","title":"Recognizing the Absence of Opposing Arguments in Persuasive Essays","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"rhetorical-structure-and-argumentation","title":"Rhetorical structure and argumentation structure in monologue text","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"scrutable-feature-sets-for-stance","title":"Scrutable Feature Sets for Stance Classification","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"summarising-the-points-made-in-online","title":"Summarising the points made in online political debates","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"summarizing-multi-party-argumentative","title":"Summarizing Multi-Party Argumentative Conversations in Reader Comment on News","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"the-cass-technique-for-evaluating-the","title":"The CASS Technique for Evaluating the Performance of Argument Mining","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"towards-feasible-guidelines-for-the","title":"Towards Feasible Guidelines for the Annotation of Argument Schemes","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"unshared-task-at-the-3rd-workshop-on-argument","title":"Unshared Task at the 3rd Workshop on Argument Mining: Perspective Based Local Agreement and Disagreement in Online Debate","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"unshared-task-disagreement-in-online-debates","title":"Unshared task: (Dis)agreement in online debates","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"what-is-your-evidence-a-study-of","title":"``What Is Your Evidence?'' A Study of Controversial Topics on Social Media","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"what-to-do-with-an-airport-mining-arguments","title":"What to Do with an Airport? Mining Arguments in the German Online Participation Project Tempelhofer Feld","date":"2016-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"end-to-end-argumentation-mining-in-student","title":"End-to-End Argumentation Mining in Student Essays","date":"2016-06-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"a-corpus-of-argument-networks-using-graph","title":"A Corpus of Argument Networks: Using Graph Properties to Analyse Divisive Issues","date":"2016-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"argument-mining-the-bottleneck-of-knowledge","title":"Argument Mining: the Bottleneck of Knowledge and Language Resources","date":"2016-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"dart-a-dataset-of-arguments-and-their","title":"DART: a Dataset of Arguments and their Relations on Twitter","date":"2016-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"argument-mining-extracting-arguments-from","title":"Argument Mining: Extracting Arguments from Online Dialogue","date":"2015-09-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"combining-argument-mining-techniques","title":"Combining Argument Mining Techniques","date":"2015-06-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"extracting-argument-and-domain-words-for","title":"Extracting Argument and Domain Words for Identifying Argument Components in Texts","date":"2015-06-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"processing-discourse-in-dislog-on-the","title":"Processing Discourse in Dislog on the TextCoop Platform","date":"2014-08-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"analyzing-argumentative-discourse-units-in","title":"Analyzing Argumentative Discourse Units in Online Interactions","date":"2014-06-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"mining-arguments-from-19th-century","title":"Mining Arguments From 19th Century Philosophical Texts Using Topic Based Modelling","date":"2014-06-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"ontology-based-argument-mining-and-automatic","title":"Ontology-Based Argument Mining and Automatic Essay Scoring","date":"2014-06-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null},{"url":null,"slug":"re-using-an-argument-corpus-to-aid-in-the","title":"Re-using an Argument Corpus to Aid in the Curation of Social Media Collections","date":"2014-05-01","arxiv_id":null,"repositories_listed":0,"syntology":null}],"record_sha256":"3457c2f731d3e9bb4c0c96fc8a2114153693741e75e9ee63aba58bd1c0eeb22e","record_changed_at":"2026-09-28","record_changed_at_basis":"first_hashed"}