{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/the-cost-accuracy-trade-off-in-operator","title":"The Cost-Accuracy Trade-Off In Operator Learning With Neural Networks","arxiv_id":"2203.13181","date":"2022-03-24","proceeding":null,"authors":["Maarten V. de Hoop","Daniel Zhengyu Huang","Elizabeth Qian","Andrew M. Stuart"],"abstract":"The term `surrogate modeling' in computational science and engineering refers to the development of computationally efficient approximations for expensive simulations, such as those arising from numerical solution of partial differential equations (PDEs). Surrogate modeling is an enabling methodology for many-query computations in science and engineering, which include iterative methods in optimization and sampling methods in uncertainty quantification. Over the last few years, several approaches to surrogate modeling for PDEs using neural networks have emerged, motivated by successes in using neural networks to approximate nonlinear maps in other areas. In principle, the relative merits of these different approaches can be evaluated by understanding, for each one, the cost required to achieve a given level of accuracy. However, the absence of a complete theory of approximation error for these approaches makes it difficult to assess this cost-accuracy trade-off. The purpose of the paper is to provide a careful numerical study of this issue, comparing a variety of different neural network architectures for operator approximation across a range of problems arising from PDE models in continuum mechanics.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.13181v3","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.13181v3.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"links_only","authors_date_abstract":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license), from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"the-cost-accuracy-trade-off-in-operator","repo_url":"https://github.com/zhengyu-huang/operator-learning","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"pytorch","reach":{"status":"ok"}},{"paper_slug":"the-cost-accuracy-trade-off-in-operator","repo_url":"https://github.com/chaow-mat/general_integral_transform_neural_network","is_official":0,"mentioned_in_paper":0,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"pytorch","reach":{"status":"ok"}}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus=2203.13181","mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}