{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/rooad-rellis-off-road-odometry-analysis","title":"ROOAD: RELLIS Off-road Odometry Analysis Dataset","arxiv_id":"2109.08228","date":"2021-09-16","proceeding":null,"authors":["George Chustz","Srikanth Saripalli"],"abstract":"The development and implementation of visual-inertial odometry (VIO) has focused on structured environments, but interest in localization in off-road environments is growing. In this paper, we present the RELLIS Off-road Odometry Analysis Dataset (ROOAD) which provides high-quality, time-synchronized off-road monocular visual-inertial data sequences to further the development of related research. We evaluated the dataset on two state-of-the-art VIO algorithms, (1) Open-VINS and (2) VINS-Fusion. Our findings indicate that both algorithms perform 2 to 30 times worse on the ROOAD dataset compared to their performance in structured environments. Furthermore, OpenVINS has better tracking stability and real-time performance than VINS-Fusion in the off-road environment, while VINS-Fusion outperformed OpenVINS in tracking accuracy in several data sequences. Since the camera-IMU calibration tool from Kalibr toolkit is used extensively in this work, we have included several calibration data sequences. Our hand measurements show Kalibr's tool achieved +/-1 degree for orientation error and +/-1 mm at best (x- and y-axis) and +/-10 mm (z-axis) at worse for position error in the camera frame between the camera and IMU. This novel dataset provides a new set of scenarios for researchers to design and test their localization algorithms on, as well as critical insights in the current performance of VIO in off-road environments. ROOAD Dataset: github.com/unmannedlab/ROOAD","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08228v2","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.08228v2.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"links_only","authors_date_abstract":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license), from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"rooad-rellis-off-road-odometry-analysis","repo_url":"https://github.com/unmannedlab/ROOAD","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"none","reach":null}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}