{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/quantifying-the-dissimilarity-of-texts","title":"Quantifying the Dissimilarity of Texts","arxiv_id":"2305.02457","date":"2023-05-03","proceeding":null,"authors":["Benjamin Shade","Eduardo G. Altmann"],"abstract":"Quantifying the dissimilarity of two texts is an important aspect of a number of natural language processing tasks, including semantic information retrieval, topic classification, and document clustering. In this paper, we compared the properties and performance of different dissimilarity measures $D$ using three different representations of texts -- vocabularies, word frequency distributions, and vector embeddings -- and three simple tasks -- clustering texts by author, subject, and time period. Using the Project Gutenberg database, we found that the generalised Jensen--Shannon divergence applied to word frequencies performed strongly across all tasks, that $D$'s based on vector embedding representations led to stronger performance for smaller texts, and that the optimal choice of approach was ultimately task-dependent. We also investigated, both analytically and numerically, the behaviour of the different $D$'s when the two texts varied in length by a factor $h$. We demonstrated that the (natural) estimator of the Jaccard distance between vocabularies was inconsistent and computed explicitly the $h$-dependency of the bias of the estimator of the generalised Jensen--Shannon divergence applied to word frequencies. We also found numerically that the Jensen--Shannon divergence and embedding-based approaches were robust to changes in $h$, while the Jaccard distance was not.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02457v1","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.02457v1.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"abstracts"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"quantifying-the-dissimilarity-of-texts","repo_url":"https://github.com/benjaminshade/quantifying-dissimilarity","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":0,"framework":"none","reach":null}],"tasks":[{"task_slug":"clustering","task_name":"Clustering"},{"task_slug":"information-retrieval","task_name":"Information Retrieval"},{"task_slug":"retrieval","task_name":"Retrieval"},{"task_slug":"topic-classification","task_name":"Topic Classification"}],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}