{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/parallel-clique-counting-and-peeling","title":"Parallel Clique Counting and Peeling Algorithms","arxiv_id":"2002.10047","date":"2020-02-24","proceeding":null,"authors":["Jessica Shi","Laxman Dhulipala","Julian Shun"],"abstract":"We present a new parallel algorithm for $k$-clique counting/listing that has polylogarithmic span (parallel time) and is work-efficient (matches the work of the best sequential algorithm) for sparse graphs. Our algorithm is based on computing low out-degree orientations, which we present new linear-work and polylogarithmic-span algorithms for computing in parallel. We also present new parallel algorithms for producing unbiased estimations of clique counts using graph sparsification. Finally, we design two new parallel work-efficient algorithms for approximating the $k$-clique densest subgraph, the first of which is a $1/k$-approximation and the second of which is a $1/(k(1+\\epsilon))$-approximation and has polylogarithmic span. Our first algorithm does not have polylogarithmic span, but we prove that it solves a P-complete problem. In addition to the theoretical results, we also implement the algorithms and propose various optimizations to improve their practical performance. On a 30-core machine with two-way hyper-threading, our algorithms achieve 13.23--38.99x and 1.19--13.76x self-relative parallel speedup for $k$-clique counting and $k$-clique densest subgraph, respectively. Compared to the state-of-the-art parallel $k$-clique counting algorithms, we achieve up to 9.88x speedup, and compared to existing implementations of $k$-clique densest subgraph, we achieve up to 11.83x speedup. We are able to compute the $4$-clique counts on the largest publicly-available graph with over two hundred billion edges for the first time.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.10047v4","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.10047v4.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"links_only","authors_date_abstract":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license), from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"parallel-clique-counting-and-peeling","repo_url":"https://github.com/ParAlg/gbbs/tree/master/benchmarks/CliqueCounting","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":0,"mentioned_in_github":0,"framework":"none","reach":null}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}