{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/joint-pruning-and-channel-wise-mixed","title":"Joint Pruning and Channel-wise Mixed-Precision Quantization for Efficient Deep Neural Networks","arxiv_id":"2407.01054","date":"2024-07-01","proceeding":null,"authors":["Beatrice Alessandra Motetti","Matteo Risso","Alessio Burrello","Enrico Macii","Massimo Poncino","Daniele Jahier Pagliari"],"abstract":"The resource requirements of deep neural networks (DNNs) pose significant challenges to their deployment on edge devices. Common approaches to address this issue are pruning and mixed-precision quantization, which lead to latency and memory occupation improvements. These optimization techniques are usually applied independently. We propose a novel methodology to apply them jointly via a lightweight gradient-based search, and in a hardware-aware manner, greatly reducing the time required to generate Pareto-optimal DNNs in terms of accuracy versus cost (i.e., latency or memory). We test our approach on three edge-relevant benchmarks, namely CIFAR-10, Google Speech Commands, and Tiny ImageNet. When targeting the optimization of the memory footprint, we are able to achieve a size reduction of 47.50% and 69.54% at iso-accuracy with the baseline networks with all weights quantized at 8 and 2-bit, respectively. Our method surpasses a previous state-of-the-art approach with up to 56.17% size reduction at iso-accuracy. With respect to the sequential application of state-of-the-art pruning and mixed-precision optimizations, we obtain comparable or superior results, but with a significantly lowered training time. In addition, we show how well-tailored cost models can improve the cost versus accuracy trade-offs when targeting specific hardware for deployment.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01054v2","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.01054v2.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"abstracts"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"joint-pruning-and-channel-wise-mixed","repo_url":"https://github.com/eml-eda/mixprec-pruning","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"pytorch","reach":null}],"tasks":[{"task_slug":"quantization","task_name":"Quantization"}],"methods":[{"method_slug":"pruning","method_name":"Pruning"}],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"syntology_url":null,"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}