{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/inspection-planning-under-execution","title":"Inspection planning under execution uncertainty","arxiv_id":"2309.06113","date":"2023-09-12","proceeding":null,"authors":["Shmuel David Alpert","Kiril Solovey","Itzik Klein","Oren Salzman"],"abstract":"Autonomous inspection tasks necessitate path-planning algorithms to efficiently gather observations from points of interest (POI). However, localization errors commonly encountered in urban environments can introduce execution uncertainty, posing challenges to successfully completing such tasks. Unfortunately, existing algorithms for inspection planning do not explicitly account for execution uncertainty, which can hinder their performance. To bridge this gap, we present IRIS-under uncertainty (IRIS-U^2), the first inspection-planning algorithm that offers statistical guarantees regarding coverage, path length, and collision probability. Our approach builds upon IRIS -- our framework for deterministic inspection planning, which is highly efficient and provably asymptotically-optimal. The extension to the much more involved uncertain setting is achieved by a refined search procedure that estimates POI coverage probabilities using Monte Carlo (MC) sampling. The efficacy of IRIS-U^2 is demonstrated through a case study focusing on structural inspections of bridges. Our approach exhibits improved expected coverage, reduced collision probability, and yields increasingly precise statistical guarantees as the number of MC samples grows. Furthermore, we demonstrate the potential advantages of computing bounded sub-optimal solutions to reduce computation time while maintaining statistical guarantees.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06113v2","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.06113v2.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"links_only","authors_date_abstract":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license), from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"inspection-planning-under-execution","repo_url":"https://github.com/crl-technion/iris-uu","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"none","reach":null},{"paper_slug":"inspection-planning-under-execution","repo_url":"https://github.com/crl-technion/simulator-iris-uu","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"none","reach":null}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}