{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/in-order-sliding-window-aggregation-in-worst","title":"In-Order Sliding-Window Aggregation in Worst-Case Constant Time","arxiv_id":"2009.13768","date":"2020-09-29","proceeding":null,"authors":["Kanat Tangwongsan","Martin Hirzel","Scott Schneider"],"abstract":"Sliding-window aggregation is a widely-used approach for extracting insights from the most recent portion of a data stream. The aggregations of interest can usually be expressed as binary operators that are associative but not necessarily commutative nor invertible. Non-invertible operators, however, are difficult to support efficiently. In a 2017 conference paper, we introduced DABA, the first algorithm for sliding-window aggregation with worst-case constant time. Before DABA, if a window had size $n$, the best published algorithms would require $O(\\log n)$ aggregation steps per window operation---and while for strictly in-order streams, this bound could be improved to $O(1)$ aggregation steps on average, it was not known how to achieve an $O(1)$ bound for the worst-case, which is critical for latency-sensitive applications. This article is an extended version of our 2017 paper. Besides describing DABA in more detail, this article introduces a new variant, DABA Lite, which achieves the same time bounds in less memory. Whereas DABA requires space for storing $2n$ partial aggregates, DABA Lite only requires space for $n+2$ partial aggregates. Our experiments on synthetic and real data support the theoretical findings.","url_abs":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.13768v1","url_pdf":"http://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.13768v1.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"links_only","authors_date_abstract":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license), from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"in-order-sliding-window-aggregation-in-worst","repo_url":"https://github.com/IBM/sliding-window-aggregators","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":0,"framework":"none","reach":null}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}