{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/improved-upper-and-lower-bounds-on-the","title":"Improved Upper and Lower Bounds on the Capacity of the Binary Deletion Channel","arxiv_id":"2305.07156","date":"2023-05-11","proceeding":null,"authors":["Ittai Rubinstein","Roni Con"],"abstract":"The {\\em binary deletion channel} with deletion probability $d$ ($\\text{BDC}_d$) is a random channel that deletes each bit of the input message i.i.d with probability $d$. It has been studied extensively as a canonical example of a channel with synchronization errors. Perhaps the most important question regarding the BDC is determining its capacity. Mitzenmacher and Drinea (ITIT 2006) and Kirsch and Drinea (ITIT 2009) show a method by which distributions on run lengths can be converted to codes for the BDC, yielding a lower bound of $\\mathcal{C}(\\text{BDC}_d) > 0.1185 \\cdot (1-d)$. Fertonani and Duman (ITIT 2010), Dalai (ISIT 2011) and Rahmati and Duman (ITIT 2014) use computer aided analyses based on the Blahut-Arimoto algorithm to prove an upper bound of $\\mathcal{C}(\\text{BDC}_d) < 0.4143\\cdot(1-d)$ in the high deletion probability regime ($d > 0.65$). In this paper, we show that the Blahut-Arimoto algorithm can be implemented with a lower space complexity, allowing us to extend the upper bound analyses, and prove an upper bound of $\\mathcal{C}(\\text{BDC}_d) < 0.3745 \\cdot(1-d)$ for all $d \\geq 0.68$. Furthermore, we show that an extension of the Blahut-Arimoto algorithm can also be used to select better run length distributions for Mitzenmacher and Drinea's construction, yielding a lower bound of $\\mathcal{C}(\\text{BDC}_d) > 0.1221 \\cdot (1 - d)$.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07156v1","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.07156v1.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"links_only","authors_date_abstract":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license), from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"improved-upper-and-lower-bounds-on-the","repo_url":"https://github.com/ittai-rubinstein/bdc_upper_bounds","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":0,"framework":"none","reach":null}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"syntology_url":null,"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}