{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/efficient-deduplication-and-leakage-detection","title":"Efficient Deduplication and Leakage Detection in Large Scale Image Datasets with a focus on the CrowdAI Mapping Challenge Dataset","arxiv_id":"2304.02296","date":"2023-04-05","proceeding":null,"authors":["Yeshwanth Kumar Adimoolam","Bodhiswatta Chatterjee","Charalambos Poullis","Melinos Averkiou"],"abstract":"Recent advancements in deep learning and computer vision have led to widespread use of deep neural networks to extract building footprints from remote-sensing imagery. The success of such methods relies on the availability of large databases of high-resolution remote sensing images with high-quality annotations. The CrowdAI Mapping Challenge Dataset is one of these datasets that has been used extensively in recent years to train deep neural networks. This dataset consists of $ \\sim\\ $280k training images and $ \\sim\\ $60k testing images, with polygonal building annotations for all images. However, issues such as low-quality and incorrect annotations, extensive duplication of image samples, and data leakage significantly reduce the utility of deep neural networks trained on the dataset. Therefore, it is an imperative pre-condition to adopt a data validation pipeline that evaluates the quality of the dataset prior to its use. To this end, we propose a drop-in pipeline that employs perceptual hashing techniques for efficient de-duplication of the dataset and identification of instances of data leakage between training and testing splits. In our experiments, we demonstrate that nearly 250k($ \\sim\\ $90%) images in the training split were identical. Moreover, our analysis on the validation split demonstrates that roughly 56k of the 60k images also appear in the training split, resulting in a data leakage of 93%. The source code used for the analysis and de-duplication of the CrowdAI Mapping Challenge dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/yeshwanth95/CrowdAI_Hash_and_search .","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02296v1","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.02296v1.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"abstracts"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"efficient-deduplication-and-leakage-detection","repo_url":"https://github.com/yeshwanth95/crowdai_hash_and_search","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"none","reach":null}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"syntology_url":null,"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}