{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/dynamic-graph-attention-for-anomaly-detection","title":"DyEdgeGAT: Dynamic Edge via Graph Attention for Early Fault Detection in IIoT Systems","arxiv_id":"2307.03761","date":"2023-07-07","proceeding":null,"authors":["Mengjie Zhao","Olga Fink"],"abstract":"In the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), condition monitoring sensor signals from complex systems often exhibit nonlinear and stochastic spatial-temporal dynamics under varying conditions. These complex dynamics make fault detection particularly challenging. While previous methods effectively model these dynamics, they often neglect the evolution of relationships between sensor signals. Undetected shifts in these relationships can lead to significant system failures. Furthermore, these methods frequently misidentify novel operating conditions as faults. Addressing these limitations, we propose DyEdgeGAT (Dynamic Edge via Graph Attention), a novel approach for early-stage fault detection in IIoT systems. DyEdgeGAT's primary innovation lies in a novel graph inference scheme for multivariate time series that tracks the evolution of relationships between time series, enabled by dynamic edge construction. Another key innovation of DyEdgeGAT is its ability to incorporate operating condition contexts into node dynamics modeling, enhancing its accuracy and robustness. We rigorously evaluated DyEdgeGAT using both a synthetic dataset, simulating varying levels of fault severity, and a real-world industrial-scale multiphase flow facility benchmark with diverse fault types under varying operating conditions and detection complexities. The results show that DyEdgeGAT significantly outperforms other baseline methods in fault detection, particularly in the early stages with low severity, and exhibits robust performance under novel operating conditions.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03761v3","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.03761v3.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"abstracts"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"dynamic-graph-attention-for-anomaly-detection","repo_url":"https://github.com/mengjiezhao/dyedgegat","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":0,"framework":"pytorch","reach":null}],"tasks":[{"task_slug":"anomaly-detection","task_name":"Anomaly Detection"},{"task_slug":"fault-detection","task_name":"Fault Detection"},{"task_slug":"time-series-1","task_name":"Time Series"},{"task_slug":"unsupervised-anomaly-detection","task_name":"Unsupervised Anomaly Detection"}],"methods":[{"method_slug":"focus","method_name":"Focus"}],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[{"leaderboard":"/sota/unsupervised-anomaly-detection-on-pronto","task":"Unsupervised Anomaly Detection","dataset":"PRONTO","model":"DyEdgeGAT","rank_in_archive_order":1,"of":1,"metrics":{"AUC":"0.8","Best Delay":"61","Best F1":"0.86","F1":"0.83"},"uses_additional_data":false},{"leaderboard":"/sota/unsupervised-anomaly-detection-on-synthetic","task":"Unsupervised Anomaly Detection","dataset":"Synthetic","model":"DyEdgeGAT","rank_in_archive_order":1,"of":1,"metrics":{"AUC":"0.83","Best Delay":"21.4","Best F1":"0.75","F1":"0.69"},"uses_additional_data":false}],"syntology":{"syntology_url":null,"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}