{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/discussion-of-a-uniqueness-result-in","title":"Discussion of a uniqueness result in \"Equilibrium Configurations for a Floating Drop\"","arxiv_id":"2206.14292","date":"2022-06-28","proceeding":null,"authors":["Ray Treinen"],"abstract":"We analyze a uniqueness result presented by Elcrat, Neel, and Siegel \\cite{ENS} for unbounded liquid bridges, and show that the proof they presented is incorrect. We add a choice of three hypothesis to their stated theorem and show that their result holds under this condition. Then we use Chebyshev spectral methods to build a numerical method to approximate solutions to a related boundary value problems that show one of the three hypothesis holds.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14292v1","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.14292v1.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"links_only","authors_date_abstract":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license), from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"discussion-of-a-uniqueness-result-in","repo_url":"https://github.com/raytreinen/unbounded-liquid-bridges","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":0,"framework":"none","reach":null}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}